Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Chevrolet Equinox FWD
Crossover · Gasoline · FWD
Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo
Car A
Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo
A practical five-seater that leans on reliability and safety while delivering efficient 6 L/100 km running and a useful 475 L cargo area. The 1.5 Turbo offers adequate pace for everyday city and highway use without chasing performance.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6 L/100km
Chevrolet Equinox FWD
Car B
Chevrolet Equinox FWD
Delivers good value in its segment for growing families, pairing 5-star safety with a generous 847 L cargo area. Efficient for its class and supported by a 78 reliability score, it suits daily use and road trips.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety170 hp
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 72 / 83
City 56 / 52
Budget / value 72 / 64
Road trip 49 / 63
Performance 23 / 28
Cargo 33 / 54
Practical 56 / 60
Premium 22 / 23
Winter 34 / 54

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo · Orange = Chevrolet Equinox FWD

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo Chevrolet Equinox FWD
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo

  • Five seats and a 475 L trunk handle day-to-day family gear
  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km, keeping running costs in check
  • 0–100 km/h in 8.4 s enables confident merging and passing
  • Emphasis on reliability and safety aligns with family priorities

Chevrolet Equinox FWD

  • 5-star safety rating for peace of mind
  • 847 L cargo space handles family gear and luggage
  • $26,000 pricing offers good value in its segment
  • Reliability score of 78 supports hassle-free ownership

Verdict

Pick Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo if…
Best fuel economy
Honda HR-V 1.5 Turbo uses 6.0 L/100km vs 8.4 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Chevrolet Equinox FWD if…
More power
Chevrolet Equinox FWD puts out 170 hp vs 130 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons