Honda Fit 2009
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Chevrolet Spark Activ
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Honda Fit 2009
Car A
Honda Fit 2009
The 2009 Honda Fit blends five-seat practicality with efficient 1.5L performance and a notably large 712 L cargo area for family and city use. Signals point to strong reliability and safety at a price that represents good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km118 hp
Chevrolet Spark Activ
Car B
Chevrolet Spark Activ
The Chevrolet Spark Activ prioritizes city driving with low running costs and genuinely useful cargo space. It’s efficient and practical for five, but modest power and highway pace favor unrushed commuting.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 76 / 48
City 74 / 74
Budget / value 74 / 55
Road trip 37 / 23
Performance 30 / 30
Cargo 40 / 22
Practical 61 / 38
Premium 13 / 10
Winter 20 / 16

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda Fit 2009 · Orange = Chevrolet Spark Activ

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda Fit 2009 Chevrolet Spark Activ
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda Fit 2009

  • Versatile 712 L cargo space supports growing families and errands
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km for city and commuting
  • Signals emphasize strong reliability and safety priorities
  • At 15,990, represents good value in its segment

Chevrolet Spark Activ

  • Low entry price at 15500 supports cost-focused buying
  • Efficient for its class with 6.7 combined consumption
  • Useful 400 L trunk adds real day-to-day practicality
  • Safety ranks as a relative strength in its segment

Verdict

Pick Honda Fit 2009 if…
Best fuel economy
Honda Fit 2009 uses 6.5 L/100km vs 6.7 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Chevrolet Spark Activ if…
Performance & capability
Chevrolet Spark Activ is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons