Chevrolet Spark LS
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2008
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Chevrolet Spark LS
Car A
Chevrolet Spark LS
Chevrolet Spark LS leans into city driving with efficient fuel use and straightforward FWD manners, offering good value in its segment. Performance is modest, but five seats and a 313 L trunk keep it practical for daily errands.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety5.8 L/100km
Honda Fit 2008
Car B
Honda Fit 2008
A practical, good-value FWD 5-seater that ranks strongly for reliability, offers a large 590 L cargo area, and returns efficient 6.6 L/100 km fuel use—well suited to city driving and growing families. Modest power and FWD traction limits make it less appealing for spirited driving or harsh winters.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline4-star safety100 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 54 / 65
City 75 / 74
Budget / value 71 / 75
Road trip 21 / 29
Performance 32 / 30
Cargo 17 / 33
Practical 49 / 58
Premium 10 / 10
Winter 16 / 16

Scores out of 100. Blue = Chevrolet Spark LS · Orange = Honda Fit 2008

Specs side-by-side

Spec Chevrolet Spark LS Honda Fit 2008
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Chevrolet Spark LS

  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km, ideal for stop-and-go commutes
  • Good value in its segment at a listed price of 13,995
  • Seats five with a useful 313 L trunk for everyday practicality
  • Reliability is a noted strength for routine use

Honda Fit 2008

  • Strong reliability signal for lower-stress ownership
  • Large 590 L trunk supports family errands and gear
  • Efficient for its class at 6.6 L/100 km combined
  • Good value in its segment at $14,900

Verdict

Pick Chevrolet Spark LS if…
Best fuel economy
Chevrolet Spark LS uses 5.8 L/100km vs 6.6 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Fit 2008 if…
More power
Honda Fit 2008 puts out 100 hp vs 98 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons