Ford Puma
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Honda HR-V 1.8X
Crossover · Gasoline
Ford Puma
Car A
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma offers good value in its segment, pairing efficient petrol running with practical five-seat space for city and family duties. It leans on reliability and safety rather than premium trimmings or performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.8 L/100km155 hp
Honda HR-V 1.8X
Car B
Honda HR-V 1.8X
A compact family model that prioritizes reliability and safety while staying efficient for daily and city use. Performance is modest, but space and price make it good value in its segment.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety
Why compared more reliablebetter valuecomparison pickalternative pickcross brandsame body type

Usage fit

Family 71 / 71
City 57 / 55
Budget / value 72 / 70
Road trip 49 / 50
Performance 22 / 27
Cargo 32 / 31
Practical 55 / 55
Premium 22 / 22
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma · Orange = Honda HR-V 1.8X

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Honda HR-V 1.8X
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma

  • Emphasis on reliability and safety for daily use
  • Good value in its segment for budget-focused buyers
  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km
  • Five seats and a 456 L trunk suit growing-family needs

Honda HR-V 1.8X

  • Strong reliability and safety focus
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km
  • Practical 5-seat layout with a 437 L trunk
  • Competitive 24,990 pricing offers good value

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma uses 5.8 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda HR-V 1.8X if…
Reliability edge
Honda HR-V 1.8X scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons