Ford Puma ST vs Honda Accord Crosstour

Ford Puma ST

Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD

Honda Accord Crosstour

Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD

Car A

Ford Puma ST

The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.

5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.9 L/100km200 hp

Car B

Honda Accord Crosstour

A five-seat, FWD gasoline family car that emphasizes space, reliability, and safety, with a generous 660 L trunk. Performance is competent rather than sporty, and at $30,000 it offers good value for growing families and road trips.

5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety

Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 74

City 59 / 45

Budget / value 64 / 65

Road trip 41 / 59

Performance 28 / 30

Cargo 25 / 37

Practical 51 / 57

Premium 25 / 30

Winter 26 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST · Orange = Honda Accord Crosstour

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST Honda Accord Crosstour

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment
FWD only, with no AWD option for those prioritizing extra traction
Not ideal for cargo-heavy use despite a decent trunk
Gasoline-only powertrain; no hybrid or EV alternative listed
Performance emphasis may not suit comfort-first buyers

Honda Accord Crosstour

Large 660 L cargo area suits family gear and road trips.
Signals a focus on reliability and safety.
Good value in its segment at $30,000.
Adequate daily performance (190 hp, 0–100 km/h in 7.5 s).
Not aimed at performance driving; acceleration is competent, not exciting.
Front-wheel drive may not suit buyers seeking AWD traction.
Five-seat layout; not ideal if you need three rows.
Gasoline powertrain and 8.1 L/100 km may not satisfy maximum fuel-savings goals.

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST if…

Best fuel economy

Ford Puma ST uses 6.9 L/100km vs 8.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Honda Accord Crosstour if…

Performance & capability

Honda Accord Crosstour is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

Honda Accord Crosstour

Verdict

Related comparisons