Ford Puma Vignale
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Honda CR-V Sport Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Ford Puma Vignale
Car A
Ford Puma Vignale
The Ford Puma Vignale mixes everyday practicality with strong efficiency, making sense for growing families and city use. It also delivers brisk 0–100 km/h in 7 s without chasing performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.7 L/100km
Honda CR-V Sport Touring
Car B
Honda CR-V Sport Touring
A five-seat, gasoline-powered model that leans toward value and family-compact use, with strong signals for reliability and safety. Adequate performance and reasonable consumption make it easy to live with, but it isn't built for cargo-heavy or enthusiast driving.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety190 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssecondary usage matchsimilar price

Usage fit

Family 69 / 61
City 55 / 50
Budget / value 64 / 63
Road trip 49 / 45
Performance 22 / 25
Cargo 32 / 15
Practical 53 / 45
Premium 25 / 26
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma Vignale · Orange = Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Vignale Honda CR-V Sport Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Vignale

  • Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km
  • 456 L trunk and 5 seats suit growing families
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 7 s for confident merging
  • Good value in its segment around the 35,000 price point

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

  • Ranks strongly for reliability and safety in its class
  • Five-seat practicality suits family-compact and city driving
  • Brisk enough 0–100 km/h in 7.5 s for confident merging
  • 8.5 L/100 km combined consumption fits mixed commuting

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma Vignale if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma Vignale uses 5.7 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda CR-V Sport Touring if…
More power
Honda CR-V Sport Touring puts out 190 hp vs 155 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons