Honda CR-V EX-L vs Honda Ridgeline RTL

Honda CR-V EX-L

Crossover · Gasoline

Honda Ridgeline RTL

Pickup · Gasoline · 4WD

Car A

Honda CR-V EX-L

The Honda CR-V EX-L puts family practicality first, with generous cargo capacity and efficiency that suit daily duties and road trips. Performance and premium flourish take a back seat, but overall it delivers good value in its segment.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety7.1 L/100km

Car B

Honda Ridgeline RTL

A practical 4WD V6 with seating for five and 1380 L of cargo capacity, the Honda Ridgeline RTL emphasizes reliability and versatility for cargo-heavy use and family trips. It favors steady capability over tight-city maneuvering or performance driving.

5 seatsPickupGasoline5-star safety280 hp

Why compared different body typeperformance gapsame brandsame powertrainsame seatsdifferent segment

Usage fit

Family 86 / 74

City 41 / 24

Budget / value 66 / 57

Road trip 71 / 65

Performance 28 / 27

Cargo 65 / 80

Practical 65 / 49

Premium 31 / 34

Winter 38 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda CR-V EX-L · Orange = Honda Ridgeline RTL

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda CR-V EX-L Honda Ridgeline RTL

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda CR-V EX-L

Roomy 1030-liter cargo area suits family gear and road-trip luggage
Five seats with practical space for growing families
Efficient for its class, with a combined consumption figure of 7.1
Emphasis on reliability and safety aligns with family priorities
Not aimed at performance driving; 0–100 in 9.1 s
Top speed of 180 won’t appeal to speed-focused shoppers
Seats 5 only—no third row
Not positioned as a premium choice

Honda Ridgeline RTL

Reliability-led choice per rankings, with safety also scoring well
1380 L cargo capacity and 4WD make hauling gear straightforward in mixed conditions
Five-seat layout suits growing families and road trips
Smooth V6 output (280 hp, 0–100 km/h in 7.0 s) for confident highway merges
Less suited to tight urban commutes per usage signals
Not aimed at performance driving or sporty handling
Combined 10.6 L/100 km may not satisfy efficiency-first shoppers
Seats five only; no third-row option for larger families

Verdict

Pick Honda CR-V EX-L if…

Best fuel economy

Honda CR-V EX-L uses 7.1 L/100km vs 10.6 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Honda Ridgeline RTL if…

More power

Honda Ridgeline RTL puts out 280 hp vs 190 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Honda CR-V EX-L

Honda Ridgeline RTL

Verdict

Related comparisons