Audi Q2 Design vs Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Audi Q2 Design

Crossover · Gasoline · AWD

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Crossover · Gasoline

Car A

Audi Q2 Design

The Audi Q2 Design pairs efficient running with AWD traction and usable space for five, making it a solid fit for family‑compact and city duties. It delivers good value in its segment without demanding compromises in day‑to‑day comfort.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.2 L/100kmAWD

Car B

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

A five-seat, gasoline-powered model that leans toward value and family-compact use, with strong signals for reliability and safety. Adequate performance and reasonable consumption make it easy to live with, but it isn't built for cargo-heavy or enthusiast driving.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety190 hp

Why compared alternative pickcross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssecondary usage match

Usage fit

Family 69 / 61

City 68 / 50

Budget / value 67 / 63

Road trip 44 / 45

Performance 28 / 25

Cargo 29 / 15

Practical 54 / 45

Premium 39 / 26

Winter 68 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q2 Design · Orange = Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q2 Design Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 Design

Efficient for its class at 5.2 combined consumption
AWD traction boosts confidence in winter and mixed conditions
Practical 5‑seat cabin and 405 L trunk for everyday family use
At 35,000, it represents good value in its segment
Not aimed at performance driving; better for everyday commuting
405 L cargo space can feel tight for gear‑heavy trips
Larger families may prefer more rear‑seat and cargo room
No rated electric range or battery spec, so not for EV shoppers

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Ranks strongly for reliability and safety in its class
Five-seat practicality suits family-compact and city driving
Brisk enough 0–100 km/h in 7.5 s for confident merging
8.5 L/100 km combined consumption fits mixed commuting
Not aimed at cargo-heavy use
190 hp and 240 Nm won’t satisfy performance-focused shoppers
Fuel use may disappoint buyers chasing maximum efficiency
Price of 35000 is good value in its segment, but not a low-cost pick

Verdict

Pick Audi Q2 Design if…

Best fuel economy

Audi Q2 Design uses 5.2 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Honda CR-V Sport Touring if…

More power

Honda CR-V Sport Touring puts out 190 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Audi Q2 Design

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Verdict

Related comparisons