Audi Q3 vs Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Audi Q3

Crossover · Gasoline · AWD

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Crossover · Gasoline

Car A

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 blends all-weather AWD confidence with efficient petrol running and five-seat practicality for growing families. It offers good value in its segment for commuting and road trips, but it isn’t built for performance driving or cargo-heavy use.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety6.1 L/100kmAWD

Car B

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

A five-seat, gasoline-powered model that leans toward value and family-compact use, with strong signals for reliability and safety. Adequate performance and reasonable consumption make it easy to live with, but it isn't built for cargo-heavy or enthusiast driving.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety190 hp

Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssecondary usage matchsimilar price

Usage fit

Family 72 / 61

City 54 / 50

Budget / value 64 / 63

Road trip 60 / 45

Performance 35 / 25

Cargo 36 / 15

Practical 55 / 45

Premium 45 / 26

Winter 74 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Audi Q3 · Orange = Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Audi Q3 Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Audi Q3

AWD traction boosts confidence in winter and mixed-weather driving.
Efficient for its class, with 6.1 L/100 km combined consumption.
Five seats and a 530-liter trunk support family life and weekend trips.
Priced at 35,000, it represents good value in its segment.
Modest acceleration (0–100 km/h in 8.3 s) and 150 hp won’t satisfy performance-focused drivers.
Cargo capacity isn’t a standout if you frequently haul bulky gear.
Petrol-only powertrain—no hybrid or EV efficiency in this spec.
AWD capability may be unnecessary if you mostly drive in mild climates.

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Ranks strongly for reliability and safety in its class
Five-seat practicality suits family-compact and city driving
Brisk enough 0–100 km/h in 7.5 s for confident merging
8.5 L/100 km combined consumption fits mixed commuting
Not aimed at cargo-heavy use
190 hp and 240 Nm won’t satisfy performance-focused shoppers
Fuel use may disappoint buyers chasing maximum efficiency
Price of 35000 is good value in its segment, but not a low-cost pick

Verdict

Pick Audi Q3 if…

Best fuel economy

Audi Q3 uses 6.1 L/100km vs 8.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Honda CR-V Sport Touring if…

More power

Honda CR-V Sport Touring puts out 190 hp vs 150 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Audi Q3

Honda CR-V Sport Touring

Verdict

Related comparisons