Honda CR-V EX
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford Puma
Crossover · Gasoline
Honda CR-V EX
Car A
Honda CR-V EX
A practical 5-seat choice that emphasizes reliability and safety, with adequate power from its 190-hp I4 and an efficient 7.5 combined consumption. Best as a value-minded family and city commuter; less ideal if you need lots of cargo space.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety190 hp
Ford Puma
Car B
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma offers good value in its segment, pairing efficient petrol running with practical five-seat space for city and family duties. It leans on reliability and safety rather than premium trimmings or performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.8 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar pricestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 61 / 71
City 53 / 57
Budget / value 67 / 72
Road trip 45 / 49
Performance 29 / 22
Cargo 15 / 32
Practical 46 / 55
Premium 24 / 22
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda CR-V EX · Orange = Ford Puma

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda CR-V EX Ford Puma
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda CR-V EX

  • Reliability-focused pick with safety also ranking highly
  • Efficient for its class (7.5 combined), well-suited to city commuting
  • 5-seat practicality fits small families and everyday use
  • Good value in its segment at a price of 29,750

Ford Puma

  • Emphasis on reliability and safety for daily use
  • Good value in its segment for budget-focused buyers
  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km
  • Five seats and a 456 L trunk suit growing-family needs

Verdict

Pick Honda CR-V EX if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Honda CR-V EX is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Ford Puma if…
Performance & capability
Ford Puma is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons