Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Ford Puma
Crossover · Gasoline
Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC
Car A
Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC
With five seats, a 437 L trunk, and 6 L/100 km consumption, the HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC targets family and city use with efficient, no‑drama performance. It offers good value in its segment at around 23,000, prioritizing reliability and safety over thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety
Ford Puma
Car B
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma offers good value in its segment, pairing efficient petrol running with practical five-seat space for city and family duties. It leans on reliability and safety rather than premium trimmings or performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.8 L/100km155 hp
Why compared more reliablecomparison picksame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 70 / 71
City 57 / 57
Budget / value 70 / 72
Road trip 50 / 49
Performance 28 / 22
Cargo 31 / 32
Practical 53 / 55
Premium 22 / 22
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC · Orange = Ford Puma

Specs side-by-side

Spec Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC Ford Puma
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC

  • Good value in its segment at around 23,000
  • Efficient for its class at 6 L/100 km
  • Practical layout with 5 seats and a 437 L trunk
  • Predictable, easy-to-drive performance for commuting (140 hp, 0–100 km/h in 10 s)

Ford Puma

  • Emphasis on reliability and safety for daily use
  • Good value in its segment for budget-focused buyers
  • Efficient for its class at 5.8 L/100 km
  • Five seats and a 456 L trunk suit growing-family needs

Verdict

Pick Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC if…
Lower entry price
Honda HR-V 1.8 I-VTEC starts lower, making it the stronger value pick if budget is a priority.
Pick Ford Puma if…
Reliability edge
Ford Puma scores higher on reliability — worth considering for long-term ownership.

Related comparisons