Ford Puma Active vs Honda HR-V 1.8X

Ford Puma Active

Crossover · Gasoline

Honda HR-V 1.8X

Crossover · Gasoline

Car A

Ford Puma Active

The Ford Puma Active prioritizes city-friendly efficiency and practicality, with a roomy 456 L boot and five seats backed by 5.7 L/100 km consumption. It represents good value in its segment, but it’s not aimed at premium or performance seekers.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.7 L/100km155 hp

Car B

Honda HR-V 1.8X

A compact family model that prioritizes reliability and safety while staying efficient for daily and city use. Performance is modest, but space and price make it good value in its segment.

5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety

Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssimilar price

Usage fit

Family 69 / 71

City 69 / 55

Budget / value 68 / 70

Road trip 40 / 50

Performance 27 / 27

Cargo 32 / 31

Practical 53 / 55

Premium 16 / 22

Winter 28 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma Active · Orange = Honda HR-V 1.8X

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Active Honda HR-V 1.8X

Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Active

Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km, easing daily fuel use.
Generous 456 L trunk supports errands and family weekends.
Balanced everyday performance (0–100 km/h in 9.0 s, 155 hp, 240 Nm).
Five-seat versatility and a 25,000 price point offer good value in its segment.
Not for performance driving; 0–100 km/h in 9.0 s and 155 hp emphasize usability over thrills.
Only five seats, so larger families may need more capacity.
If you want premium branding or upscale interiors, this model isn’t positioned as premium.
Shoppers chasing the absolute lowest purchase price may find smaller city cars cheaper.

Honda HR-V 1.8X

Strong reliability and safety focus
Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km
Practical 5-seat layout with a 437 L trunk
Competitive 24,990 pricing offers good value
Modest acceleration (0-100 km/h in about 10 s) won’t suit enthusiasts
140 hp and 174 Nm may feel limited when fully loaded
Top speed of 180 km/h isn’t aimed at high-speed touring
Not targeted at premium-oriented buyers

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma Active if…

Best fuel economy

Ford Puma Active uses 5.7 L/100km vs 6.5 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.

Pick Honda HR-V 1.8X if…

Performance & capability

Honda HR-V 1.8X is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Usage fit

Specs side-by-side

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Active

Honda HR-V 1.8X

Verdict

Related comparisons