Ford Puma ST-Line
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Accord Crosstour
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST-Line
Car A
Ford Puma ST-Line
The Ford Puma ST-Line blends family-friendly space with efficient running and punchy acceleration. It suits growing families and city driving while offering good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km200 hp
Honda Accord Crosstour
Car B
Honda Accord Crosstour
A five-seat, FWD gasoline family car that emphasizes space, reliability, and safety, with a generous 660 L trunk. Performance is competent rather than sporty, and at $30,000 it offers good value for growing families and road trips.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 65 / 74
City 60 / 45
Budget / value 65 / 65
Road trip 41 / 59
Performance 29 / 30
Cargo 25 / 37
Practical 52 / 57
Premium 25 / 30
Winter 26 / 30

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST-Line · Orange = Honda Accord Crosstour

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST-Line Honda Accord Crosstour
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST-Line

  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 combined consumption.
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.7 s for confident merging and overtakes.
  • 456 L boot and five seats work well for growing-family errands and trips.
  • Around 30,000, it represents good value in its segment.

Honda Accord Crosstour

  • Large 660 L cargo area suits family gear and road trips.
  • Signals a focus on reliability and safety.
  • Good value in its segment at $30,000.
  • Adequate daily performance (190 hp, 0–100 km/h in 7.5 s).

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST-Line if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma ST-Line uses 6.5 L/100km vs 8.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda Accord Crosstour if…
Performance & capability
Honda Accord Crosstour is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons