Ford Puma Vignale
Crossover · Gasoline
vs
Honda CR-V Touring
Crossover · Gasoline
Ford Puma Vignale
Car A
Ford Puma Vignale
The Ford Puma Vignale mixes everyday practicality with strong efficiency, making sense for growing families and city use. It also delivers brisk 0–100 km/h in 7 s without chasing performance thrills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety5.7 L/100km
Honda CR-V Touring
Car B
Honda CR-V Touring
The Honda CR-V Touring emphasizes family practicality and dependable daily use at a price that reads as good value in its segment. Big cargo space plus strong reliability and safety signals suit growing families who need room without excess frills.
5 seatsCrossoverGasoline5-star safety190 hp
Why compared cross brandsame body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilesimilar price

Usage fit

Family 69 / 86
City 55 / 51
Budget / value 64 / 65
Road trip 49 / 63
Performance 22 / 26
Cargo 32 / 64
Practical 53 / 64
Premium 25 / 25
Winter 34 / 34

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma Vignale · Orange = Honda CR-V Touring

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma Vignale Honda CR-V Touring
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma Vignale

  • Efficient for its class at 5.7 L/100 km
  • 456 L trunk and 5 seats suit growing families
  • Quick 0–100 km/h in 7 s for confident merging
  • Good value in its segment around the 35,000 price point

Honda CR-V Touring

  • Expansive 1014 L cargo area for strollers, sports gear, and luggage
  • Strong reliability and safety signals for low-stress family duty
  • Responsive acceleration (0–100 km/h in 7.5 s) for confident merging
  • At $33,500, represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma Vignale if…
Best fuel economy
Ford Puma Vignale uses 5.7 L/100km vs 8.1 — a meaningful saving if you cover high mileage.
Pick Honda CR-V Touring if…
More power
Honda CR-V Touring puts out 190 hp vs 155 — meaningfully quicker and more confident on motorways.

Related comparisons