Ford Puma ST
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2009
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST
Car A
Ford Puma ST
The Ford Puma ST combines lively performance with everyday usefulness, pairing 0–100 km/h in 6.7s with a 456 L boot and five seats. It’s efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km and offers good value in its segment around 30,000.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Honda Fit 2009
Car B
Honda Fit 2009
The 2009 Honda Fit blends five-seat practicality with efficient 1.5L performance and a notably large 712 L cargo area for family and city use. Signals point to strong reliability and safety at a price that represents good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety6.5 L/100km
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 76
City 59 / 74
Budget / value 64 / 74
Road trip 41 / 37
Performance 28 / 30
Cargo 25 / 40
Practical 51 / 61
Premium 25 / 13
Winter 26 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST · Orange = Honda Fit 2009

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST Honda Fit 2009
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST

  • Punchy acceleration (0–100 km/h in 6.7s) for confident merging and passing
  • Efficient for its class at 6.9 L/100km to help manage running costs
  • Practical 456 L boot and five seats suit growing families
  • Pricing around 30,000 represents good value in its segment

Honda Fit 2009

  • Versatile 712 L cargo space supports growing families and errands
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km for city and commuting
  • Signals emphasize strong reliability and safety priorities
  • At 15,990, represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Puma ST is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Honda Fit 2009 if…
Performance & capability
Honda Fit 2009 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons