Ford Puma ST-Line
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
vs
Honda Fit 2009
Hatchback · Gasoline · FWD
Ford Puma ST-Line
Car A
Ford Puma ST-Line
The Ford Puma ST-Line blends family-friendly space with efficient running and punchy acceleration. It suits growing families and city driving while offering good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety200 hp
Honda Fit 2009
Car B
Honda Fit 2009
The 2009 Honda Fit blends five-seat practicality with efficient 1.5L performance and a notably large 712 L cargo area for family and city use. Signals point to strong reliability and safety at a price that represents good value in its segment.
5 seatsHatchbackGasoline5-star safety
Why compared same body typesame powertrainsame seatssame usage profilestrong usage match

Usage fit

Family 65 / 76
City 60 / 74
Budget / value 65 / 74
Road trip 41 / 37
Performance 29 / 30
Cargo 25 / 40
Practical 52 / 61
Premium 25 / 13
Winter 26 / 20

Scores out of 100. Blue = Ford Puma ST-Line · Orange = Honda Fit 2009

Specs side-by-side

Spec Ford Puma ST-Line Honda Fit 2009
Values are representative — confirm for your market and trim.

Pros & cons

Ford Puma ST-Line

  • Efficient for its class with 6.5 combined consumption.
  • Brisk 0–100 km/h in 6.7 s for confident merging and overtakes.
  • 456 L boot and five seats work well for growing-family errands and trips.
  • Around 30,000, it represents good value in its segment.

Honda Fit 2009

  • Versatile 712 L cargo space supports growing families and errands
  • Efficient for its class at 6.5 L/100 km for city and commuting
  • Signals emphasize strong reliability and safety priorities
  • At 15,990, represents good value in its segment

Verdict

Pick Ford Puma ST-Line if…
Efficiency & everyday ease
Ford Puma ST-Line is the choice if fuel economy and city-friendly driving are your priority.
Pick Honda Fit 2009 if…
Performance & capability
Honda Fit 2009 is the choice if you want more power, speed, or all-weather capability.

Related comparisons